PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRR vs. FELG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRR vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's 6.60% return.


FDRR

1D
0.00%
1M
5.51%
6M
12.92%
YTD
15.67%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.06%

FELG

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.71%
6M
11.02%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
17.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.12M$1.06M$1.10M
$15.94M$13.86M$19.26M

FDRR vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
15.67%21.70%20.24%6.76%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
6.60%18.44%35.45%4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and FELG is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.77

The correlation between FDRR and FELG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. FELG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRR
FELG

Technology

35.7%
55.9%

Financial Services

12.4%
4.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
5.7%

Communication Services

9.6%
14.7%

Industrials

9.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.2%

Energy

3.2%
0.7%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.1%

Utilities

2.3%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.1%

Technology

FDRR
35.7%
FELG
55.9%

Financial Services

FDRR
12.4%
FELG
4.6%

Healthcare

FDRR
10.2%
FELG
5.7%

Communication Services

FDRR
9.6%
FELG
14.7%

Industrials

FDRR
9.0%
FELG
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDRR
8.2%
FELG
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDRR
4.7%
FELG
1.2%

Energy

FDRR
3.2%
FELG
0.7%

Real Estate

FDRR
2.9%
FELG
0.1%

Utilities

FDRR
2.3%
FELG
1.2%

Basic Materials

FDRR
1.9%
FELG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRR vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FELG
FELG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDRR vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDRRFELGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

1.08

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.50

3.35

+10.16

FDRR vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and FELG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and FELG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRRFELGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-23.89%

-12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-16.17%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.35%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-3.61%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

5.20%

-3.06%

Volatility

FDRR vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.41%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRRFELGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

6.63%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

13.96%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

17.36%

-5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

20.08%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

20.08%

-3.28%

FDRR vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDRR vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FELG's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.02%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
0.35%0.38%0.44%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRR and FELG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELG has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to FDRR (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs FELG's -23.89%.

On 1-year performance, FDRR leads with 28.88% vs 17.38% for FELG. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 28.88% return vs 17.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELG.

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.35% for FELG.

FDRR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FELG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.18% for FELG.

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRR and FELG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer