FDRR vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. FDRR is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.34%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDRR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FDRR vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 15.59% return.

FDRR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 21.03%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	10.01%	21.70%	20.24%	13.66%	-9.73%	26.06%	19.28%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and FBCG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.76

The correlation between FDRR and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDRR	FBCG
Technology	34.5%	48.3%
Financial Services	12.0%	2.2%
Communication Services	10.7%	16.6%
Healthcare	9.4%	6.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	17.2%
Industrials	8.7%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	1.3%
Energy	3.6%	0.4%
Real Estate	2.9%	0.7%
Utilities	2.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	2.2%	0.6%

Return for Risk

FDRR vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 82
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDRR	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.14	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.96	2.84	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.36	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	2.61	+1.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	10.14	+5.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDRR vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDRR	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.14	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.62	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.83	-0.02

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRR	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-43.56%	+7.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-15.17%	+6.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-27.89%	+9.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-43.56%	+22.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	-1.05%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-11.49%	+7.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	3.90%	-1.90%

Volatility

FDRR vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.08%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRR	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	4.79%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.31%	13.89%	-5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.04%	18.55%	-7.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.00%	25.79%	-10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	25.72%	-8.84%

FDRR vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRR vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.10%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRR and FBCG in my portfolio?

FDRR and FBCG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRR or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FDRR (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, FDRR or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 12.34% for FDRR. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRR or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRR or FBCG?

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRR or FBCG?

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FDRR and FBCG?

Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.