FDNI vs. ILCB
FDNI (First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FDNI tracks the Dow Jones International Internet Index while ILCB tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNI returned -7.52%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for ILCB. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDNI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
FDNI vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDNI achieves a -18.17% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 10.04% return.
FDNI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 7.51%
- 6M
- -16.34%
- YTD
- -18.17%
- 1Y
- -14.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- -7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.14%
ILCB
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.35K | $352.24K | $738.30K | |
| $856.67K | $1.50M | $1.33M |
FDNI vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | -18.17% | 25.64% | 22.46% | 1.78% | -38.38% | -20.59% | 85.27% | 38.38% | -8.39% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 10.04% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -9.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNI and ILCB is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FDNI and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDNI vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNI
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNI
ILCB
Communication Services
FDNI
ILCB
Technology
FDNI
ILCB
Financial Services
FDNI
ILCB
Real Estate
FDNI
ILCB
Healthcare
FDNI
ILCB
Basic Materials
FDNI
-
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
FDNI
-
ILCB
Energy
FDNI
-
ILCB
Industrials
FDNI
-
ILCB
Utilities
FDNI
-
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNI vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
FDNI
ILCB
FDNI vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDNI | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.26 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 2.12 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | 8.94 | -9.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDNI vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNI | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.08% | -51.53% | -19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.42% | -9.09% | -28.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.42% | -19.05% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.70% | -25.47% | -38.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.38% | -1.64% | -47.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.88% | -6.21% | -28.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.59% | 2.15% | +19.44% |
Volatility
FDNI vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 3.59%. This indicates that FDNI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNI | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 3.59% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.06% | 10.22% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.13% | 13.01% | +12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 17.24% | +19.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 18.18% | +16.21% |
FDNI vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNI vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than ILCB's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | 1.36% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNI and ILCB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDNI has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to ILCB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDNI dropped -71.08% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 12.26% vs -7.52% for FDNI. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 12.26% return vs -7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.
FDNI has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.98% for ILCB.
FDNI tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDNI and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer