FDND vs. GXPT
FDND (FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FDND is actively managed, while GXPT is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDND charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
FDND vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDND achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 17.49% return.
FDND
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 1.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 17.10%
- YTD
- 17.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDND vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 0.64% | -0.69% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 17.49% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDND and GXPT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDND vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
FDND
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDND vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF (FDND) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDND | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDND vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDND drawdown since its inception was -24.12%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDND and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDND | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.12% | -18.74% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -8.22% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -5.23% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | — | — |
Volatility
FDND vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDND | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.08% | 22.98% | -3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 22.98% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 22.98% | -1.57% |
FDND vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDND has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDND vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
FDND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, more than GXPT's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF | 8.10% | 8.11% | 5.51% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDND and GXPT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FDND.
FDND has the higher dividend yield at 8.10%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FDND and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for FDND and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer