FDN vs. RDVY
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDN returned 13.59%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FDN vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 13.59%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.
FDN
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.78%
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $116.36M | $88.95M | $109.31M | |
| $77.65M | $79.19M | $83.63M |
FDN vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 2.08% | 10.70% | 30.35% | 51.48% | -45.54% | 6.55% | 52.55% | 19.25% | 6.17% | 37.64% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 17.25% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and RDVY is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FDN and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDN vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDN
RDVY
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDN
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FDN
RDVY
Communication Services
FDN
RDVY
Financial Services
FDN
RDVY
Healthcare
FDN
RDVY
Industrials
FDN
RDVY
Basic Materials
FDN
-
RDVY
-
Consumer Defensive
FDN
-
RDVY
Energy
FDN
-
RDVY
Real Estate
FDN
-
RDVY
-
Utilities
FDN
-
RDVY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
RDVY
FDN vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 3.25 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 13.63 | -13.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDN vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -40.60% | -20.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | -9.04% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | -19.11% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | -25.32% | -28.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | -40.60% | -13.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.17% | 0.00% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -4.95% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.15% | +6.76% |
Volatility
FDN vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 3.53% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 11.46% | +4.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 14.65% | +5.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 18.92% | +8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 21.03% | +4.62% |
FDN vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.83% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and RDVY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDN has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 13.59% for FDN. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDN.
RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDN and 0.47% for RDVY.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDN and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer