PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FDN vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FDN vs. KWEB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDN returned 13.85%/yr vs -0.57%/yr for KWEB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDN charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

FDN vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -28.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 13.85%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.57% annualized return.

FDN

1D
-0.49%
1M
-5.63%
YTD
-3.99%
6M
-4.90%
1Y
0.72%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
13.85%

KWEB

1D
-2.24%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-28.08%
6M
-29.18%
1Y
-22.79%
3Y*
0.71%
5Y*
-15.81%
10Y*
-0.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index		-3.99%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF		-28.08%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-17.24%-49.01%58.23%29.92%-33.80%69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and KWEB is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.56

The correlation between FDN and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FDN
KWEB

Technology

43.1%
17.5%

Communication Services

27.0%
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
36.0%

Financial Services

2.0%
2.0%

Industrials

1.3%
3.3%

Healthcare

1.2%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

2.7%

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

3.9%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDN
43.1%
KWEB
17.5%

Communication Services

FDN
27.0%
KWEB
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
25.5%
KWEB
36.0%

Financial Services

FDN
2.0%
KWEB
2.0%

Industrials

FDN
1.3%
KWEB
3.3%

Healthcare

FDN
1.2%
KWEB
6.0%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

KWEB

-

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

KWEB
2.7%

Energy

FDN

-

KWEB

-

Real Estate

FDN

-

KWEB
3.9%

Utilities

FDN

-

KWEB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

Often compared with FDN:
FDN vs. QQQFDN vs. FDNIFDN vs. VGTFDN vs. WEBLFDN vs. SKYYFDN vs. XLKFDN vs. OGIG
Often compared with KWEB:
KWEB vs. CQQQKWEB vs. FXIKWEB vs. MCHIKWEB vs. KTECKWEB vs. CWEBKWEB vs. KLIPKWEB vs. YINN

Return for Risk

FDN vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FDNKWEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.04
-0.84

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.18
-1.15

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.87

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.58

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.09

-1.22

+1.31

FDN vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDN vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and KWEB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FDNKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-80.92%

+19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-39.49%

+18.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-39.49%

+14.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-72.17%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-80.92%

+26.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.81%

-71.68%

+60.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-35.36%

+23.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.54%

18.70%

-10.16%

Volatility

FDN vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) is 7.48%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that FDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FDNKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

8.34%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

20.47%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

27.17%

-7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

47.70%

-20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.63%

40.00%

-14.37%

FDN vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDN vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF		8.56%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

FDN and KWEB have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KWEB has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to FDN (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

On 10-year performance, FDN leads with 13.85% vs -0.57% for KWEB. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDN has performed better with a 13.85% return vs -0.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 8.56%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.70% for KWEB.

FDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer