PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. PNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has outperformed PNQI with an annualized return of 13.65%, while PNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.72% annualized return.


FDN

1D
2.93%
1M
5.92%
6M
7.93%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.94%

PNQI

1D
2.07%
1M
5.39%
6M
-2.80%
YTD
-7.26%
1Y
-2.35%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
11.72%
ALL TIME*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$122.99M$91.40M$110.17M
$4.57M$3.44M$2.68M

FDN vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
5.08%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
-7.26%15.56%29.44%60.69%-47.92%-5.57%61.36%28.76%-5.08%40.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and PNQI is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2008

0.91

The correlation between FDN and PNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDN vs. PNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
PNQI

Technology

45.2%
41.2%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
25.1%

Communication Services

25.2%
30.5%

Financial Services

1.9%
2.8%

Healthcare

1.1%
0.0%

Industrials

1.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDN
45.2%
PNQI
41.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
25.5%
PNQI
25.1%

Communication Services

FDN
25.2%
PNQI
30.5%

Financial Services

FDN
1.9%
PNQI
2.8%

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
PNQI
0.0%

Industrials

FDN
1.0%
PNQI
0.0%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Energy

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Real Estate

FDN

-

PNQI
0.3%

Utilities

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PNQI
PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDN vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNPNQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.00

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-0.10

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

-0.19

+0.96

FDN vs. PNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the PNQI Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and PNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDN vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and PNQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNPNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-59.70%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-24.85%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-24.85%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-59.34%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-59.70%

+5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-12.35%

+9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-13.00%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

12.69%

-3.78%

Volatility

FDN vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) have volatilities of 6.44% and 6.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNPNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

6.59%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

16.61%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

20.07%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

27.07%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.67%

25.39%

+0.28%

FDN vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison

Neither FDN nor PNQI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and PNQI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNQI has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FDN (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs PNQI's -59.70%.

On 10-year performance, FDN leads with 13.65% vs 11.72% for PNQI. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDN has performed better with a 13.65% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.

FDN and PNQI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, while PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDN and 0.62% for PNQI.

FDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and PNQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer