PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. PNQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. PNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than PNQI's -11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FDN has outperformed PNQI with an annualized return of 14.37%, while PNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.


FDN

1D
-1.90%
1M
4.74%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
14.37%

PNQI

1D
-1.82%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
-11.20%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN vs. PNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
4.18%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
-11.20%15.56%29.44%60.69%-47.92%-5.57%61.36%28.76%-5.08%40.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and PNQI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2008

0.90

The correlation between FDN and PNQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDN vs. PNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
PNQI

Technology

37.7%
38.5%

Communication Services

29.7%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%
27.7%

Financial Services

2.4%
2.6%

Industrials

1.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

1.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FDN
37.7%
PNQI
38.5%

Communication Services

FDN
29.7%
PNQI
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
27.7%
PNQI
27.7%

Financial Services

FDN
2.4%
PNQI
2.6%

Industrials

FDN
1.4%
PNQI
0.1%

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
PNQI
0.0%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Energy

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Real Estate

FDN

-

PNQI
0.4%

Utilities

FDN

-

PNQI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. PNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PNQI
PNQI Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN vs. PNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNPNQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

-0.11

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

-0.25

+1.49

FDN vs. PNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the PNQI Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and PNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNPNQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

-0.15

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.00

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.47

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.52

+0.03

Drawdowns

FDN vs. PNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, roughly equal to the maximum PNQI drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and PNQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNPNQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-59.70%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-24.85%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-24.85%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-59.56%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-59.70%

+5.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-16.07%

+12.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-12.96%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

10.52%

-2.17%

Volatility

FDN vs. PNQI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) at 4.75%. This indicates that FDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNPNQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.75%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

13.86%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

18.07%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.25%

26.81%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

25.29%

+0.31%

FDN vs. PNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than PNQI's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. PNQI - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PNQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
0.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDN and PNQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDN has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to PNQI (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs PNQI's -59.70%.

On 10-year performance, FDN leads with 14.37% vs 11.84% for PNQI. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, PNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDN has performed better with a 14.37% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PNQI.

PNQI has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Index, while PNQI tracks NASDAQ Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.62% for PNQI.

FDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and PNQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer