FDN vs. GARY
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDN is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
FDN vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 28.36% return.
FDN
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.94%
GARY
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 17.11%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $122.99M | $91.40M | $110.17M | |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | $604.89K | $386.84K | $304.13K |
FDN vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 5.08% | -0.44% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 28.36% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and GARY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDN vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDN | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDN vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -12.67% | -48.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -6.45% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -2.42% | -9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | — | — |
Volatility
FDN vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 22.41% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 22.41% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 22.41% | +3.26% |
FDN vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and GARY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDN and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for FDN and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer