FDN vs. CCOR
FDN (First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FDN is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDN returned 4.24%/yr vs -2.56%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDN charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
FDN vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.
FDN
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 10.29%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FDN vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 4.18% | 10.70% | 30.35% | 51.48% | -45.54% | 6.55% | 52.55% | 19.25% | 6.17% | 16.81% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.70% | -11.92% | 2.51% | 9.90% | 4.07% | 6.03% | 4.64% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDN and CCOR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017 | 0.04 |
The correlation between FDN and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (3 years) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDN vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDN
CCOR
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDN
CCOR
Communication Services
FDN
CCOR
Consumer Cyclical
FDN
CCOR
Financial Services
FDN
CCOR
Industrials
FDN
CCOR
Healthcare
FDN
CCOR
Basic Materials
FDN
-
CCOR
Consumer Defensive
FDN
-
CCOR
Energy
FDN
-
CCOR
Real Estate
FDN
-
CCOR
Utilities
FDN
-
CCOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDN vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
FDN
CCOR
FDN vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDN | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.87 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.69 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | -1.59 | +2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDN | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | -0.87 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | -0.23 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.11 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
FDN vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDN | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.55% | -22.99% | -38.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.31% | -8.75% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.98% | -12.31% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.97% | -22.99% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | -20.03% | +16.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.82% | -7.29% | -4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 3.77% | +4.58% |
Volatility
FDN vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that FDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDN | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 1.78% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 4.96% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 6.93% | +12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.25% | 11.10% | +16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 10.75% | +14.85% |
FDN vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDN vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDN and CCOR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDN has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs CCOR's -22.99%.
On 5-year performance, FDN leads with 4.24% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDN has performed better with a 4.24% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 1.09% for CCOR.
FDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDN and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer