PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 11.15% return.


FDN

1D
-1.90%
1M
4.74%
YTD
4.18%
6M
3.26%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
14.37%

BOTZ

1D
-0.91%
1M
4.92%
YTD
11.15%
6M
13.89%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
4.18%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
11.15%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and BOTZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.73

The correlation between FDN and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
BOTZ

Technology

37.7%
31.8%

Communication Services

29.7%
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

27.7%
6.1%

Financial Services

2.4%
0.9%

Industrials

1.4%
48.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
9.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

FDN
37.7%
BOTZ
31.8%

Communication Services

FDN
29.7%
BOTZ
4.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
27.7%
BOTZ
6.1%

Financial Services

FDN
2.4%
BOTZ
0.9%

Industrials

FDN
1.4%
BOTZ
48.6%

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
BOTZ
9.0%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Real Estate

FDN

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDNBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.53

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

5.26

-4.03

FDN vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDNBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.24

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.12

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

FDN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-55.54%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-19.34%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-29.02%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-55.54%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-3.27%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.82%

-18.32%

+6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.35%

5.63%

+2.72%

Volatility

FDN vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index (FDN) is 5.14%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that FDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

7.77%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

18.40%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

23.98%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.25%

26.73%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

25.73%

-0.13%

FDN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.59%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to FDN (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, FDN leads with 4.24% vs 3.18% for BOTZ. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDN has performed better with a 4.24% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for FDN and 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer