PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDN vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDN achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -0.78% return.


FDN

1D
2.93%
1M
5.92%
6M
7.93%
YTD
5.08%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
13.65%
ALL TIME*
13.94%

BOTZ

1D
2.02%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.50%
YTD
-0.78%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.33M$29.66M$37.04M
$122.99M$91.40M$110.17M

FDN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
5.08%10.70%30.35%51.48%-45.54%6.55%52.55%19.25%6.17%37.64%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
-0.78%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDN and BOTZ is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.72

The correlation between FDN and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDN vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDN
BOTZ

Technology

45.2%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

25.5%
6.2%

Communication Services

25.2%
4.2%

Financial Services

1.9%
0.9%

Healthcare

1.1%
8.0%

Industrials

1.0%
50.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

FDN
45.2%
BOTZ
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDN
25.5%
BOTZ
6.2%

Communication Services

FDN
25.2%
BOTZ
4.2%

Financial Services

FDN
1.9%
BOTZ
0.9%

Healthcare

FDN
1.1%
BOTZ
8.0%

Industrials

FDN
1.0%
BOTZ
50.8%

Basic Materials

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Real Estate

FDN

-

BOTZ

-

Utilities

FDN

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDN
FDN Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDNBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

0.47

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

1.18

-0.41

FDN vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDN Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is comparable to the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDN and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDN drawdown since its inception was -61.55%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDN and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDNBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.55%

-55.54%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.31%

-19.34%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-29.02%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.97%

-55.54%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-13.65%

+11.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-18.22%

+6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

7.64%

+1.27%

Volatility

FDN vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund (FDN) is 6.44%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that FDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDNBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

9.24%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

21.66%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

26.47%

-6.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.46%

27.29%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.67%

25.89%

-0.22%

FDN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

FDN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.49%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
FDN
First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDN and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to FDN (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDN dropped -61.55% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, FDN leads with 3.08% vs 1.12% for BOTZ. On fees, FDN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FDN has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDN has performed better with a 3.08% return vs 1.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for FDN.

FDN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BOTZ is Artificial Intelligence. FDN tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDN and 0.68% for BOTZ.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDN and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer