FDMO vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. FDMO is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, FDMO returned 26.27% vs 266.72% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -31.90% return.

FDMO

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 10.53%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 26.27%
• 3Y*: 26.24%
• 5Y*: 15.49%
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -11.25%
• 1M: 29.92%
• 6M: -7.52%
• YTD: -31.90%
• 1Y: 266.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	14.58%	21.43%	8.19%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-31.90%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and MSTZ is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.48

Return for Risk

FDMO vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 53
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMO	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.81	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.41	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.16	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.24	6.14	+2.10

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMO	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-99.38%	+65.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-84.89%	+72.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-97.68%	+94.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-94.54%	+89.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	43.66%	-40.46%

Volatility

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 7.09%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 57.19%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMO	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	57.19%	-50.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	135.18%	-119.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	148.74%	-130.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	171.04%	-151.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.61%	171.04%	-151.43%

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMO vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.59%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMO and MSTZ in my portfolio?

FDMO and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMO or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (57.19%) compared to FDMO (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, FDMO or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 266.72% vs 26.27% for FDMO. On fees, FDMO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDMO or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 266.72% return vs 26.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDMO or MSTZ?

FDMO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDMO or MSTZ?

FDMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between FDMO and MSTZ?

FDMO is categorized as Momentum, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDMO and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.