FDMLX vs. CIMDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDMLX (Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund) and CIMDX (Clarkston Founders Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FDMLX returned 10.82%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for CIMDX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDMLX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CIMDX.

Performance

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than CIMDX's -8.37% return.

FDMLX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 23.68%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 13.19%

CIMDX

• 1D: -2.19%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -8.37%
• 6M: -8.81%
• 1Y: -1.52%
• 3Y*: 3.83%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	12.14%	11.64%	10.76%	19.77%	-3.24%	27.54%	11.45%	17.72%	-7.17%	22.15%
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	-8.37%	7.35%	5.67%	10.38%	-3.67%	6.23%	23.21%	23.74%	-7.85%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and CIMDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.80

The correlation between FDMLX and CIMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. CIMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX

FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CIMDX

CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMLX	CIMDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	-0.10	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	-0.02	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.00	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	-0.13	+2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.72	-0.32	+9.04

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the CIMDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and CIMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than CIMDX's maximum drawdown of -31.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and CIMDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMLX	CIMDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-31.86%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-11.83%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.52%	-14.82%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-17.98%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-11.83%	+11.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-5.92%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	4.93%	-2.11%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) is 3.43%, while Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) has a volatility of 5.16%. This indicates that FDMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMLX	CIMDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	5.16%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	12.47%	-2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.38%	16.38%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	16.05%	+5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	17.51%	+1.70%

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CIMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMLX vs. CIMDX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.37%, more than CIMDX's 3.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIMDX Clarkston Founders Fund	3.54%	3.24%	0.45%	1.62%	6.38%	0.44%	0.91%	3.32%	2.27%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.37%	11.63%	12.75%	24.60%	65.08%	18.63%	4.18%	4.94%	9.28%	4.53%	1.51%	5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMLX and CIMDX in my portfolio?

FDMLX and CIMDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMLX or CIMDX?

CIMDX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to FDMLX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs CIMDX's -31.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.