PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIMDX vs. DALCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
-6.99%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%
DALCX
Dean Mid Cap Value Fund
3.48%9.49%16.50%12.82%-4.68%28.25%-2.05%26.96%-11.07%14.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -6.99% return, which is significantly lower than DALCX's 3.48% return.


CIMDX

1D
0.92%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-6.99%
6M
-4.06%
1Y
0.79%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*

DALCX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-8.46%
YTD
3.48%
6M
4.87%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
10.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CIMDX vs. DALCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DALCX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CIMDX vs. DALCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

DALCX
DALCX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
DALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIMDXDALCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.07

0.79

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.24

1.20

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.16

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

1.00

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.01

3.74

-3.73

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the DALCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIMDX and DALCX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIMDXDALCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

0.79

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.67

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.57

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CIMDX and DALCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Dividend Comparison

CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than DALCX's 5.96% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.49%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%
DALCX
Dean Mid Cap Value Fund
5.96%6.17%7.23%5.42%5.38%5.42%0.88%8.28%3.50%2.61%0.43%0.14%

Drawdowns

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum DALCX drawdown of -41.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and DALCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMDXDALCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.86%

-41.99%

+10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-11.54%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.26%

-15.64%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.49%

-8.64%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.20%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.08%

+0.49%

Volatility

CIMDX vs. DALCX - Volatility Comparison

Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Dean Mid Cap Value Fund (DALCX) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CIMDXDALCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

4.50%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

9.29%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.62%

16.35%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.78%

15.10%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.76%

-0.26%