FDMLX vs. FLPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX).
FDMLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. FLPSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 1989.
Performance
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund | -1.22% | 11.64% | 10.76% | 19.77% | -3.24% | 27.54% | 11.45% | 17.72% | -7.17% | 24.39% |
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | -1.04% | 14.69% | 7.23% | 14.41% | -5.69% | 24.46% | 9.34% | 25.75% | -10.80% | 18.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than FLPSX's -1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX has outperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.89% annualized return.
FDMLX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
FLPSX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPSX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDMLX vs. FLPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FDMLX
FLPSX
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMLX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.88 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.05 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 4.35 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMLX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.88 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.83 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMLX and FLPSX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison
FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, less than FLPSX's 13.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund | 11.77% | 11.63% | 12.75% | 24.60% | 65.08% | 18.63% | 4.18% | 4.94% | 9.28% | 4.53% | 1.51% | 5.76% |
FLPSX Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund | 13.42% | 13.28% | 16.24% | 18.29% | 9.45% | 12.11% | 11.14% | 8.14% | 13.45% | 7.45% | 4.85% | 4.04% |
Drawdowns
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum FLPSX drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and FLPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMLX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -54.81% | +19.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -12.50% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -18.76% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.03% | -38.16% | +3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.01% | -8.81% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -5.68% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.03% | +0.50% |
Volatility
FDMLX vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDMLX | FLPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.14% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 9.10% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 16.76% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 17.18% | +4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 17.32% | +1.85% |