PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIMDX vs. FMPOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIMDX achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than FMPOX's 22.56% return.


CIMDX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
-6.33%
6M
-7.11%
1Y
0.62%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*

FMPOX

1D
1.40%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.56%
6M
21.00%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
-6.33%7.35%5.67%10.38%-3.67%6.23%23.21%23.74%-7.85%11.25%
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
22.56%13.02%14.48%22.51%-10.62%33.96%0.95%23.61%-18.93%14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CIMDX and FMPOX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.84

The correlation between CIMDX and FMPOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIMDX vs. FMPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIMDX
CIMDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CIMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CIMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FMPOX
FMPOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FMPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMDXFMPOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.43

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

4.01

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

15.40

-15.24

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIMDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the FMPOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIMDX and FMPOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIMDX drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum FMPOX drawdown of -61.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIMDX and FMPOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMDXFMPOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.86%

-61.76%

+29.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.29%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.82%

-23.74%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-23.74%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.86%

-0.24%

-9.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.92%

-9.04%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

2.68%

+2.20%

Volatility

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clarkston Founders Fund (CIMDX) is 4.69%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (FMPOX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that CIMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMDXFMPOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

5.43%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.28%

12.52%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

16.66%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

20.26%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

21.17%

-3.67%

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FMPOX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIMDX vs. FMPOX - Dividend Comparison

CIMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, less than FMPOX's 6.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIMDX
Clarkston Founders Fund
3.46%3.24%0.45%1.62%6.38%0.44%0.91%3.32%2.27%0.41%0.00%0.00%
FMPOX
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
6.40%8.26%10.51%1.17%13.25%1.31%2.00%1.86%14.92%8.99%1.37%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIMDX and FMPOX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMPOX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to CIMDX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIMDX dropped -31.86% vs FMPOX's -61.76%.

FMPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIMDX and FMPOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer