PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMLX vs. FDEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDEGX's 11.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDMLX having a 12.49% annualized return and FDEGX not far behind at 12.21%.


FDMLX

1D
0.17%
1M
1.75%
YTD
9.50%
6M
11.28%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
12.49%

FDEGX

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.75%
YTD
11.04%
6M
1.36%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
12.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
9.50%11.64%10.76%19.77%-3.24%27.54%11.45%17.72%-7.17%24.39%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
11.04%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and FDEGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.75

The correlation between FDMLX and FDEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX
FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMLXFDEGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

0.30

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

0.54

+1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.07

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

0.36

+2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.02

0.91

+7.10

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMLXFDEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

0.30

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.37

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.56

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.40

+0.35

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and FDEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMLXFDEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-85.96%

+50.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-20.45%

+11.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.52%

-26.04%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-36.62%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-36.62%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.76%

+4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-36.83%

+32.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

7.99%

-5.17%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) is 3.77%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that FDMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMLXFDEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

6.00%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

18.87%

-9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

21.98%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

23.31%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

22.04%

-2.83%

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMLX vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
FDMLX
Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund
10.62%11.63%12.75%24.60%65.08%18.63%4.18%4.94%9.28%4.53%1.51%5.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDMLX and FDEGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FDMLX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

FDMLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMLX and FDEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer