FDMLX vs. FSMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX).
FDMLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. FSMVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 15, 2001.
Performance
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund | -1.22% | 11.64% | 10.76% | 19.77% | -3.24% | 27.54% | 11.45% | 17.72% | -7.17% | 24.39% |
FSMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.59% | 13.06% | 14.53% | 22.59% | -10.64% | 34.00% | 0.95% | 23.57% | -18.91% | 17.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a -1.22% return, which is significantly lower than FSMVX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX has outperformed FSMVX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while FSMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.
FDMLX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
FSMVX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMVX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDMLX vs. FSMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FDMLX
FSMVX
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDMLX | FSMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.42 | -0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.20 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 4.92 | -1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDMLX | FSMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.44 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDMLX and FSMVX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Dividend Comparison
FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.77%, more than FSMVX's 7.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund | 11.77% | 11.63% | 12.75% | 24.60% | 65.08% | 18.63% | 4.18% | 4.94% | 9.28% | 4.53% | 1.51% | 5.76% |
FSMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund | 7.82% | 8.28% | 10.41% | 1.17% | 13.12% | 1.30% | 1.99% | 1.87% | 14.79% | 8.92% | 1.34% | 5.15% |
Drawdowns
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum FSMVX drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and FSMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDMLX | FSMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -62.96% | +27.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -14.74% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.52% | -23.70% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.03% | -45.11% | +10.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.01% | -10.30% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -9.00% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FDMLX vs. FSMVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) is 4.15%, while Fidelity Mid Cap Value Fund (FSMVX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that FDMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDMLX | FSMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.64% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.43% | 11.77% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.76% | 21.47% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 20.10% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 21.02% | -1.85% |