PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.87% return.


FDM

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.82%
6M
12.70%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
11.66%

OUSM

1D
0.65%
1M
0.72%
YTD
6.87%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDM vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
9.82%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.87%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and OUSM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.83

The correlation between FDM and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDM vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
OUSM

Financial Services

41.2%
21.1%

Industrials

16.4%
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
19.3%

Technology

6.2%
13.5%

Healthcare

6.2%
9.2%

Energy

5.0%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.9%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Utilities

1.0%
3.9%

Financial Services

FDM
41.2%
OUSM
21.1%

Industrials

FDM
16.4%
OUSM
22.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
10.0%
OUSM
19.3%

Technology

FDM
6.2%
OUSM
13.5%

Healthcare

FDM
6.2%
OUSM
9.2%

Energy

FDM
5.0%
OUSM
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.7%
OUSM
4.9%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.2%
OUSM
1.4%

Communication Services

FDM
3.7%
OUSM
3.8%

Real Estate

FDM
1.4%
OUSM

-

Utilities

FDM
1.0%
OUSM
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDM vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMOUSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

0.92

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

1.46

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.16

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

1.26

+2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.59

3.68

+6.91

FDM vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.92

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.46

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.48

-0.13

Drawdowns

FDM vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than OUSM's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-39.84%

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-9.21%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-19.44%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-19.44%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-1.60%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-5.22%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

3.14%

-0.09%

Volatility

FDM vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.82%. This indicates that FDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

3.82%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

9.27%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

13.16%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.37%

16.30%

+5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

18.94%

+4.41%

FDM vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.25%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and OUSM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDM has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to OUSM (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 5-year performance, FDM leads with 8.84% vs 7.50% for OUSM. On fees, OUSM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDM has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.25% for FDM.

FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.48% for OUSM.

FDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer