PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FDM has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.85%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.70% annualized return.


FDM

1D
1.96%
1M
0.81%
6M
9.75%
YTD
17.92%
1Y
37.07%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.85%
ALL TIME*
8.92%

SCHD

1D
0.27%
1M
3.61%
6M
13.71%
YTD
24.36%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$657.67K$929.96K$758.49K
$806.58M$724.91M$690.35M

FDM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
17.92%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.36%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and SCHD is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FDM and SCHD has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
SCHD

Financial Services

43.4%
9.9%

Industrials

14.3%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
7.7%

Healthcare

6.6%
20.8%

Technology

6.6%
12.7%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
20.6%

Energy

4.4%
14.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Utilities

0.9%
0.1%

Financial Services

FDM
43.4%
SCHD
9.9%

Industrials

FDM
14.3%
SCHD
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
9.8%
SCHD
7.7%

Healthcare

FDM
6.6%
SCHD
20.8%

Technology

FDM
6.6%
SCHD
12.7%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.9%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.6%
SCHD
20.6%

Energy

FDM
4.4%
SCHD
14.1%

Communication Services

FDM
3.2%
SCHD
6.2%

Real Estate

FDM
1.3%
SCHD

-

Utilities

FDM
0.9%
SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

6.94

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

17.53

-4.91

FDM vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-33.37%

-30.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-4.61%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-16.13%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-16.85%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

-33.37%

-14.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.97%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-3.29%

-7.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.82%

+1.13%

Volatility

FDM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that FDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

3.82%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

7.99%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

11.06%

+7.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.26%

14.39%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

16.73%

+6.61%

FDM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than SCHD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.34%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.12%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDM has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.70% vs 11.85% for FDM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.34% for FDM.

FDM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer