FDLS vs. VXF
FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FDLS tracks the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 19.65%/yr vs 19.75%/yr for VXF. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
FDLS vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 13.78% return.
FDLS
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXF
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
FDLS vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 13.12% | 22.47% | 7.41% | 20.70% | -1.68% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 13.78% | 11.40% | 16.89% | 25.51% | -9.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLS and VXF is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FDLS and VXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDLS vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDLS
VXF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FDLS
VXF
Industrials
FDLS
VXF
Financial Services
FDLS
VXF
Healthcare
FDLS
VXF
Energy
FDLS
VXF
Basic Materials
FDLS
VXF
Consumer Defensive
FDLS
VXF
Consumer Cyclical
FDLS
VXF
Communication Services
FDLS
VXF
Real Estate
FDLS
VXF
Utilities
FDLS
VXF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLS vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
FDLS
VXF
FDLS vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLS | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.84 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 10.07 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLS | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.69 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.46 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
FDLS vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLS | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -58.03% | +34.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -10.21% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -26.92% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.02% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -9.55% | +5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 2.87% | -0.50% |
Volatility
FDLS vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 4.36%, while Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLS | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.87% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 12.44% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.71% | 17.22% | -0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 22.33% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 22.29% | -3.22% |
FDLS vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLS vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than VXF's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLS and VXF have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXF has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FDLS (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs VXF's -58.03%.
On 3-year performance, VXF leads with 19.75% vs 19.65% for FDLS. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXF has performed better with a 19.75% return vs 19.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.
VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.87% for FDLS.
FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.05% for VXF.
FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLS and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer