FDLS vs. ETIEX
FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and ETIEX (Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund) are both funds - FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ETIEX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Eventide Funds. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 18.51%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for ETIEX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.43%/yr for ETIEX.
Performance
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than ETIEX's 22.50% return.
FDLS
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETIEX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 15.47%
- YTD
- 22.50%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 33.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 11.53% | 22.47% | 7.41% | 20.70% | -1.68% |
ETIEX Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund | 22.50% | 8.94% | 2.52% | 31.96% | -21.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLS and ETIEX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FDLS and ETIEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLS vs. ETIEX — Risk / Return Rank
FDLS
ETIEX
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund (ETIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLS | ETIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 1.68 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | 5.36 | +7.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLS | ETIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.36 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.32 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum ETIEX drawdown of -53.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and ETIEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLS | ETIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -53.83% | +30.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -19.88% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.32% | -30.86% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -12.96% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -30.07% | +26.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 6.20% | -3.81% |
Volatility
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) is 4.83%, while Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund (ETIEX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that FDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLS | ETIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 6.71% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.71% | 19.22% | -6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 24.55% | -7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 32.89% | -13.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 33.45% | -14.35% |
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than ETIEX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLS vs. ETIEX - Dividend Comparison
FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while ETIEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIEX Eventide Exponential Technologies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 0.11% |
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 7.26% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLS and ETIEX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETIEX has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to FDLS (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs ETIEX's -53.83%.
FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLS and ETIEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer