PortfoliosLab logo
FDLS vs. BIBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and BIBL is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

FDLS vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.94%
18.89%
FDLS
BIBL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDLS:

0.05

BIBL:

0.15

Sortino Ratio

FDLS:

0.22

BIBL:

0.36

Omega Ratio

FDLS:

1.03

BIBL:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FDLS:

0.05

BIBL:

0.15

Martin Ratio

FDLS:

0.16

BIBL:

0.58

Ulcer Index

FDLS:

6.71%

BIBL:

5.44%

Daily Std Dev

FDLS:

22.63%

BIBL:

21.13%

Max Drawdown

FDLS:

-23.32%

BIBL:

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

FDLS:

-14.75%

BIBL:

-11.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's -3.36% return.


FDLS

YTD

-6.69%

1M

-2.45%

6M

-5.95%

1Y

0.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BIBL

YTD

-3.36%

1M

-1.94%

6M

-6.29%

1Y

1.99%

5Y*

10.77%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDLS vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FDLS: current value is 0.76%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FDLS: 0.76%
Expense ratio chart for BIBL: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BIBL: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDLS vs. BIBL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDLS is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDLS is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDLS is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDLS is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDLS is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDLS is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIBL is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIBL is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDLS vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FDLS: 0.05
BIBL: 0.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FDLS: 0.22
BIBL: 0.36
The chart of Omega ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FDLS: 1.03
BIBL: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FDLS: 0.05
BIBL: 0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FDLS: 0.16
BIBL: 0.58

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.05
0.15
FDLS
BIBL

Dividends

FDLS vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than BIBL's 1.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
7.71%7.26%0.97%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.06%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.62%0.31%

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and BIBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-14.75%
-11.17%
FDLS
BIBL

Volatility

FDLS vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 14.41% and 14.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.41%
14.46%
FDLS
BIBL