FDLS vs. BIBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL).
FDLS and BIBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDLS is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Aug 23, 2022. BIBL is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2017. Both FDLS and BIBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDLS or BIBL.
Key characteristics
| FDLS | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.99% | 19.81% |
| 1Y Return | 24.14% | 31.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.71 | 2.38 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.43 | 3.32 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.30 | 1.42 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.30 | 1.98 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.12 | 14.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.84% | 2.51% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.79% | 15.01% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.20% | -36.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.10% | -1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLS and BIBL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDLS vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 19.81% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDLS vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDLS vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDLS vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison
FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than BIBL's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | 1.06% | 0.97% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.98% | 17.87% | 1.67% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
FDLS vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -15.20%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and BIBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDLS vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 4.48%. This indicates that FDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.