PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDLS vs. BIBL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and BIBL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FDLS vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.40%
7.71%
FDLS
BIBL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDLS:

1.14

BIBL:

1.48

Sortino Ratio

FDLS:

1.62

BIBL:

2.08

Omega Ratio

FDLS:

1.21

BIBL:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

FDLS:

2.19

BIBL:

2.22

Martin Ratio

FDLS:

5.58

BIBL:

7.07

Ulcer Index

FDLS:

3.46%

BIBL:

3.19%

Daily Std Dev

FDLS:

16.97%

BIBL:

15.30%

Max Drawdown

FDLS:

-15.20%

BIBL:

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

FDLS:

-1.97%

BIBL:

-1.34%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDLS having a 7.29% return and BIBL slightly higher at 7.34%.


FDLS

YTD

7.29%

1M

7.17%

6M

7.39%

1Y

16.62%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BIBL

YTD

7.34%

1M

6.45%

6M

7.71%

1Y

19.79%

5Y*

10.48%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDLS vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for FDLS: current value at 0.76% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.76%
Expense ratio chart for BIBL: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDLS vs. BIBL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDLS is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDLS is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDLS is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDLS is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDLS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDLS is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIBL is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIBL is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIBL is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIBL is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIBL is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIBL is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDLS vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.141.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.622.08
The chart of Omega ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.211.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.192.66
The chart of Martin ratio for FDLS, currently valued at 5.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.005.587.07
FDLS
BIBL

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and BIBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.14
1.48
FDLS
BIBL

Dividends

FDLS vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than BIBL's 0.85% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
6.77%7.26%0.97%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
0.85%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.62%0.31%

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -15.20%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and BIBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.97%
-1.34%
FDLS
BIBL

Volatility

FDLS vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 5.96%. This indicates that FDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.37%
5.96%
FDLS
BIBL
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab