PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


FDLO

1D
0.15%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
2.45%
6M
1.90%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
2.45%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and UGA is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.14

The correlation between FDLO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLOUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.17

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

9.39

-2.44

FDLO vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-86.59%

+52.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-18.96%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-26.68%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-38.11%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-18.05%

+14.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-36.69%

+33.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

6.43%

-4.73%

Volatility

FDLO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 2.52%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

9.24%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

30.57%

-23.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.87%

35.22%

-26.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.08%

34.45%

-21.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

37.22%

-21.74%

FDLO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.45%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and UGA have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to FDLO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 9.28% for FDLO. On fees, FDLO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDLO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

FDLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while UGA is Oil & Gas. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer