PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. IDLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. IDLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than IDLV's 2.63% return.


FDLO

1D
0.36%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.38%
6M
4.87%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*

IDLV

1D
0.27%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
2.63%
6M
4.87%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. IDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.38%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.63%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and IDLV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.68

The correlation between FDLO and IDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLO vs. IDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
IDLV

Technology

33.1%
0.7%

Financial Services

12.5%
22.9%

Communication Services

10.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
3.8%

Healthcare

9.5%
1.7%

Industrials

9.1%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
13.8%

Energy

3.4%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
11.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
15.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.3%

Technology

FDLO
33.1%
IDLV
0.7%

Financial Services

FDLO
12.5%
IDLV
22.9%

Communication Services

FDLO
10.8%
IDLV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.2%
IDLV
3.8%

Healthcare

FDLO
9.5%
IDLV
1.7%

Industrials

FDLO
9.1%
IDLV
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.7%
IDLV
13.8%

Energy

FDLO
3.4%
IDLV
3.6%

Utilities

FDLO
2.3%
IDLV
11.4%

Real Estate

FDLO
2.3%
IDLV
15.4%

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.7%
IDLV
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. IDLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. IDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOIDLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.18

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

1.25

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

3.66

+5.96

FDLO vs. IDLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the IDLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and IDLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOIDLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

0.96

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.51

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.45

+0.38

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. IDLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, roughly equal to the maximum IDLV drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and IDLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOIDLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-34.65%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-7.54%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-9.97%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-22.52%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-5.69%

+5.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-5.95%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.57%

-0.94%

Volatility

FDLO vs. IDLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 1.91%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) has a volatility of 2.51%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOIDLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

2.51%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.42%

7.65%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

9.76%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

11.79%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

13.39%

+2.11%

FDLO vs. IDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IDLV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. IDLV - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than IDLV's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.69%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and IDLV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDLV has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs IDLV's -34.65%.

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.20% vs 5.93% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.20% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.

FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.25% for IDLV.

FDLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and IDLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer