PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. IUSV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed IUSV with an annualized return of 11.24%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%

IUSV

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.24%
YTD
7.63%
6M
7.88%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
7.63%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and IUSV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2006

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and IUSV has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
IUSV

Energy

27.3%
7.2%

Healthcare

16.8%
11.0%

Financial Services

15.1%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

14.7%
8.8%

Communication Services

10.6%
3.1%

Utilities

6.5%
4.3%

Industrials

3.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
11.1%

Technology

1.1%
20.8%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

-

3.7%

Energy

FDL
27.3%
IUSV
7.2%

Healthcare

FDL
16.8%
IUSV
11.0%

Financial Services

FDL
15.1%
IUSV
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
14.7%
IUSV
8.8%

Communication Services

FDL
10.6%
IUSV
3.1%

Utilities

FDL
6.5%
IUSV
4.3%

Industrials

FDL
3.8%
IUSV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
3.8%
IUSV
11.1%

Technology

FDL
1.1%
IUSV
20.8%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.3%
IUSV
3.6%

Real Estate

FDL

-

IUSV
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLIUSVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

3.35

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.56

12.84

+0.71

FDL vs. IUSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the IUSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and IUSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLIUSVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.14

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.72

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.71

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.60

-0.15

Drawdowns

FDL vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and IUSV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLIUSVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-56.88%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-6.36%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-17.76%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-17.95%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-37.54%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-0.51%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-6.29%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.66%

+0.09%

Volatility

FDL vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 2.14%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLIUSVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.14%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

7.14%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

9.98%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

14.55%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

17.07%

+0.04%

FDL vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than IUSV's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.68%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and IUSV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to IUSV (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs IUSV's -56.88%.

On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 12.04% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.68% for IUSV.

FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.04% for IUSV.

IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and IUSV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer