PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDL vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDL vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 12.30% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FDL has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 11.09%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


FDL

1D
-0.32%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
11.09%

ILCV

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
7.44%
6M
6.30%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDL vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.30%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.44%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDL and ILCV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2006

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and ILCV has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDL vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDL
ILCV

Energy

25.7%
6.0%

Healthcare

17.6%
11.4%

Financial Services

15.2%
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

14.4%
7.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
7.9%

Utilities

6.5%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
9.6%

Industrials

3.9%
8.6%

Technology

1.4%
24.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Energy

FDL
25.7%
ILCV
6.0%

Healthcare

FDL
17.6%
ILCV
11.4%

Financial Services

FDL
15.2%
ILCV
16.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDL
14.4%
ILCV
7.5%

Communication Services

FDL
10.6%
ILCV
7.9%

Utilities

FDL
6.5%
ILCV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDL
4.7%
ILCV
9.6%

Industrials

FDL
3.9%
ILCV
8.6%

Technology

FDL
1.4%
ILCV
24.7%

Basic Materials

FDL
0.3%
ILCV
2.4%

Real Estate

FDL

-

ILCV
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDL vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDL vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDLILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

3.76

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

15.38

-3.33

FDL vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDL and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDL vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than ILCV's maximum drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.93%

-58.63%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-6.55%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-14.95%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

-18.58%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

-35.53%

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-1.54%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-9.30%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.60%

+0.22%

Volatility

FDL vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.90%. This indicates that FDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.90%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

7.20%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

10.01%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

14.21%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

16.65%

+0.46%

FDL vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDL has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDL vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.71%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDL and ILCV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to ILCV (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.78% vs 11.09% for FDL. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.63% for ILCV.

FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for FDL and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDL and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer