FDL vs. AVLV
FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FDL tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index while AVLV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDL returned 18.97%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDL charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.
Performance
FDL vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDL achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
AVLV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 22.01%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | 6.66% | 9.84% |
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 20.64% | 15.12% | 17.49% | 17.43% | -5.53% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDL and AVLV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDL and AVLV has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDL vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDL
AVLV
Energy
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
FDL
AVLV
Healthcare
FDL
AVLV
Financial Services
FDL
AVLV
Consumer Defensive
FDL
AVLV
Communication Services
FDL
AVLV
Utilities
FDL
AVLV
Industrials
FDL
AVLV
Consumer Cyclical
FDL
AVLV
Technology
FDL
AVLV
Basic Materials
FDL
AVLV
Real Estate
FDL
-
AVLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDL vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank
FDL
AVLV
FDL vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDL | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.57 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 6.09 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 24.39 | -10.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDL | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.18 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
FDL vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDL drawdown since its inception was -65.93%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDL and AVLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDL | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.93% | -19.50% | -46.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -6.39% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -19.50% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | 0.00% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -3.93% | -5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.59% | +0.16% |
Volatility
FDL vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) is 2.85%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDL | AVLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 3.12% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 9.04% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 12.29% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.31% | 17.35% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 17.35% | -0.24% |
FDL vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDL has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDL vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison
FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.58% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDL and AVLV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVLV has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDL dropped -65.93% vs AVLV's -19.50%.
On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 18.97% for FDL. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.
FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, while AVLV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDL and 0.15% for AVLV.
AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDL and AVLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer