FDIV vs. USO
FDIV (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIV is a Dividend fund actively managed by MarketDesk, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. FDIV is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIV returned -1.98%/yr vs 5.64%/yr for USO. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDIV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
FDIV vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 86.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed USO with an annualized return of -1.98%, while USO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.64% annualized return.
FDIV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- -11.15%
- 5Y*
- -7.91%
- 10Y*
- -1.98%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.05%
USO
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 62.44%
- YTD
- 86.77%
- 1Y
- 66.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.95M | $1.06M | $524.89K | |
| $968.42M | $871.56M | $931.57M |
FDIV vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 3.86% | 2.95% | -37.35% | 6.78% | -9.97% | 10.20% | -2.84% | 15.78% | -5.04% | 6.19% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 86.77% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIV and USO is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between FDIV and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIV vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
FDIV
USO
FDIV vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.25 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.93 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 5.60 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIV vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.90% | -98.19% | +50.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -32.49% | +24.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.64% | -32.49% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -36.23% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.90% | -86.75% | +38.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.12% | -86.26% | +50.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -75.38% | +63.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 12.03% | -8.99% |
Volatility
FDIV vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) is 4.23%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that FDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIV | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 17.73% | -13.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 42.79% | -33.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 46.91% | -34.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 37.06% | -16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 39.29% | -21.89% |
FDIV vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIV vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 2.38% | 2.95% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.81% | 3.79% | 4.17% | 3.93% | 5.13% | 3.81% | 3.84% | 4.13% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIV and USO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (17.73%) compared to FDIV (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, USO leads with 5.64% vs -1.98% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USO has performed better with a 5.64% return vs -1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
FDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
FDIV is categorized as Dividend, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIV and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer