FDIV vs. HIGH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FDIV (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIV is a Dividend fund actively managed by MarketDesk, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDIV returned -11.05%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for HIGH. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDIV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HIGH.

Performance

FDIV vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -0.61% return.

FDIV

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: 0.12%
• 6M: 1.26%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 1Y: 9.64%
• 3Y*: -11.05%
• 5Y*: -7.78%
• 10Y*: -2.03%

HIGH

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: -0.45%
• YTD: -0.61%
• 1Y: -2.26%
• 3Y*: 2.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF	4.68%	2.95%	-37.35%	6.78%	1.51%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	-0.61%	4.35%	1.52%	7.70%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and HIGH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.22

Return for Risk

FDIV vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV

FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 27
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

HIGH

HIGH Risk / Return Rank: 6
HIGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
HIGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
HIGH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
HIGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HIGH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDIV	HIGH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	-0.31	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-0.41	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.95	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	-0.32	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.13	-0.52	+3.65

FDIV vs. HIGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the HIGH Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and HIGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than HIGH's maximum drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and HIGH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDIV	HIGH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.90%	-9.50%	-38.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.01%	-7.08%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.64%	-9.50%	-36.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.62%	-7.33%	-28.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.39%	-2.52%	-8.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	4.34%	-1.25%

Volatility

FDIV vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 1.87%. This indicates that FDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDIV	HIGH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	1.87%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.10%	3.76%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.52%	7.25%	+5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.89%	9.48%	+11.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	9.48%	+7.89%

FDIV vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HIGH's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDIV vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than HIGH's 7.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF	2.36%	2.95%	4.12%	4.63%	3.81%	3.79%	4.17%	3.93%	5.13%	3.81%	3.84%	4.13%
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF	7.10%	7.71%	8.34%	9.40%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDIV and HIGH in my portfolio?

FDIV and HIGH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDIV or HIGH?

FDIV has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to HIGH (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs HIGH's -9.50%.

Which ETF is better, FDIV or HIGH?

On 3-year performance, HIGH leads with 2.69% vs -11.05% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDIV or HIGH?

Over the 3-year period, HIGH has performed better with a 2.69% return vs -11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDIV or HIGH?

FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HIGH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDIV or HIGH?

HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 2.36% for FDIV.

What is the main difference between FDIV and HIGH?

FDIV is categorized as Dividend, while HIGH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.50% for HIGH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.