FDIV vs. DIVB
FDIV (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both Dividend funds. FDIV is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDIV returned -7.96%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for DIVB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
FDIV vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 17.14% return.
FDIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- -11.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.96%
- 10Y*
- -1.87%
DIVB
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIV vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 3.41% | 2.95% | -37.35% | 6.78% | -9.97% | 10.20% | -2.84% | 15.78% | -5.04% | 1.36% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 17.14% | 15.09% | 18.59% | 13.27% | -10.51% | 31.29% | 10.78% | 32.72% | -8.16% | 5.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIV and DIVB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FDIV and DIVB shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIV vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
FDIV
DIVB
FDIV vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIV | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.42 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 4.08 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 13.64 | -10.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIV vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than DIVB's maximum drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIV | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.90% | -36.93% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -6.82% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.64% | -15.45% | -30.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -21.08% | -26.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.39% | -1.10% | -35.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.25% | -4.97% | -6.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.04% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FDIV vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) is 3.37%, while iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that FDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIV | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 4.61% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | 8.84% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 11.70% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 15.26% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.56% | 18.36% | -0.80% |
FDIV vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIV vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than DIVB's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 2.81% | 2.95% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.81% | 3.79% | 4.17% | 3.93% | 5.13% | 3.81% | 3.84% | 4.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIV and DIVB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVB has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to FDIV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs DIVB's -36.93%.
On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.39% vs -7.96% for FDIV. On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.39% return vs -7.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIV.
FDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.27% for DIVB.
They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.05% for DIVB.
DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIV and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer