PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. XLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. XLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 13.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDIS having a 13.98% annualized return and XLI not far ahead at 14.15%.


FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%

XLI

1D
0.59%
1M
1.47%
YTD
13.90%
6M
13.10%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
13.90%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XLI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.70

The correlation between FDIS and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIS vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
XLI

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%

-

Technology

0.9%
4.0%

Industrials

0.8%
90.7%

Communication Services

0.2%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
XLI
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
XLI

-

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
XLI
4.0%

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
XLI
90.7%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
XLI

-

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
XLI

-

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
XLI

-

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
XLI

-

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

XLI

-

Energy

FDIS

-

XLI

-

Utilities

FDIS

-

XLI
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISXLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.98

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

7.82

-5.58

FDIS vs. XLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the XLI Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and XLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and XLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISXLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-62.26%

+23.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-12.21%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-18.49%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-21.64%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-42.33%

+3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-1.24%

-3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-9.20%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.09%

+1.92%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) have volatilities of 6.19% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISXLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.22%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

13.59%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

16.17%

+2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

17.55%

+6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

20.04%

+2.28%

FDIS vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FDIS and XLI have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XLI's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.16%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and XLI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs XLI's -62.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 13.98% for FDIS. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS and XLI have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLI is Industrials Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street.

XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and XLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer