PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. RWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. RWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than RWR's 16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed RWR with an annualized return of 13.98%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.69% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
2.10%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%

RWR

1D
0.93%
1M
5.40%
YTD
16.67%
6M
16.81%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
12.26%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
16.67%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and RWR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.49

The correlation between FDIS and RWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISRWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.25

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.49

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

8.47

-6.23

FDIS vs. RWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the RWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and RWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and RWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISRWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-74.92%

+35.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-8.04%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-18.85%

-8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-32.58%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-44.39%

+5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

0.00%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-13.09%

+5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

2.36%

+2.65%

Volatility

FDIS vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) at 4.93%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISRWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

4.93%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

9.94%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

13.72%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

19.04%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

21.52%

+0.80%

FDIS vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than RWR's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.27%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and RWR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RWR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs RWR's -74.92%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while RWR is REIT. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.25% for RWR.

RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and RWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer