FDIS vs. RCL
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FDIS returned 13.25%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for RCL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FDIS vs. RCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than RCL's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has underperformed RCL with an annualized return of 13.25%, while RCL has yielded a comparatively higher 15.99% annualized return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 5.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.45%
RCL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- -16.87%
- 3Y*
- 42.18%
- 5Y*
- 30.12%
- 10Y*
- 15.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.50%
FDIS vs. RCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.90% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 3.68% | 22.46% | 78.98% | 161.97% | -35.72% | 2.96% | -43.50% | 39.94% | -16.13% | 48.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and RCL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.55 |
The correlation between FDIS and RCL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. RCL — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
RCL
FDIS vs. RCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIS | RCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.97 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | -0.52 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | -0.85 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. RCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum RCL drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and RCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | RCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -89.49% | +50.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -32.36% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -35.02% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -67.64% | +28.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | -83.30% | +44.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -20.44% | +14.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -27.73% | +20.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 19.85% | -14.65% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. RCL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.26%, while Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a volatility of 10.01%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | RCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 10.01% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.02% | 37.58% | -23.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 47.08% | -28.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 48.39% | -24.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 53.32% | -30.99% |
Dividends
FDIS vs. RCL - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than RCL's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.75% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 2.22% | 2.66% | 1.81% | 2.08% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and RCL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCL has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to FDIS (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs RCL's -89.49%.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and RCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer