FDIS vs. NUMV
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDIS returned 6.19%/yr vs 6.55%/yr for NUMV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
FDIS vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than NUMV's 9.74% return.
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
NUMV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.65% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 9.74% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and NUMV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FDIS and NUMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDIS vs. NUMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
NUMV
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
NUMV
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
NUMV
Technology
FDIS
NUMV
Industrials
FDIS
NUMV
Communication Services
FDIS
NUMV
Healthcare
FDIS
NUMV
Financial Services
FDIS
NUMV
Real Estate
FDIS
NUMV
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
NUMV
Energy
FDIS
-
NUMV
Utilities
FDIS
-
NUMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
NUMV
FDIS vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIS | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 1.92 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 2.79 | -1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.74 | -2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 10.37 | -8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIS | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.92 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.38 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.45 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum NUMV drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | -43.46% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -8.71% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | -19.53% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | -25.71% | -13.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -0.42% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -6.89% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 2.29% | +2.64% |
Volatility
FDIS vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) at 2.97%. This indicates that FDIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 2.97% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 9.14% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 12.49% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 17.39% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 19.77% | +2.52% |
FDIS vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIS vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than NUMV's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and NUMV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIS has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs NUMV's -43.46%.
On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 6.55% vs 6.19% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.
NUMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.31% for NUMV.
NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer