FDIQ vs. GSIB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB).
FDIQ and GSIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2011. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023.
Performance
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 11.45% | 6.32% | 12.76% | -0.28% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | -3.15% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIQ achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's -3.15% return.
FDIQ
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 5.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
GSIB
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 36.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FDIQ and GSIB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
FDIQ vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank
FDIQ
GSIB
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIQ | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.79 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 2.39 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 2.51 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 8.62 | -3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIQ | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.79 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 2.15 | -1.77 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIQ and GSIB is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
FDIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than GSIB's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIQ Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF | 2.52% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.89% | 2.51% | 2.04% | 2.92% | 2.44% | 2.45% | 1.59% | 1.50% | 1.92% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.97% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIQ and GSIB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIQ | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.86% | -17.71% | -35.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -14.59% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -9.87% | +2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -2.06% | -9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 4.25% | +0.59% |
Volatility
FDIQ vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) is 5.91%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that FDIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIQ | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.91% | 7.69% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 13.05% | +4.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.55% | 20.79% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 18.39% | +10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 18.39% | +12.82% |