PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIAX vs. FSIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIAX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FSIAX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIAX has underperformed FSIAX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while FSIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.63% annualized return.


FDIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.29%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
1.93%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

FSIAX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.25%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.69%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
3.63%
ALL TIME*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIAX
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A
0.29%6.38%4.09%5.76%-6.45%-1.62%4.86%5.72%0.40%1.58%
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
1.69%8.59%5.03%8.83%-12.06%3.22%7.30%10.76%-2.93%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIAX and FSIAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1994

0.53

The correlation between FDIAX and FSIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIAX vs. FSIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDIAX
FDIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FDIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIAX
FSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDIAXFSIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.02

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.16

7.51

-1.35

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FSIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIAX and FSIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIAX drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum FSIAX drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIAX and FSIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIAXFSIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.45%

-17.81%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

-2.66%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.63%

-3.72%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.83%

-16.19%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.20%

-16.19%

+5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.74%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-1.83%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

0.71%

-0.24%

Volatility

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) is 0.45%, while Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that FDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIAXFSIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.98%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

3.28%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

3.77%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.77%

4.56%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.40%

4.45%

-2.05%

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIAX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIAX vs. FSIAX - Dividend Comparison

FDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than FSIAX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIAX
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A
3.51%3.63%2.57%1.90%1.03%1.09%2.09%2.14%1.99%1.48%1.55%1.31%
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
3.78%4.06%3.21%3.71%2.71%4.01%4.32%4.07%3.51%3.70%3.49%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIAX and FSIAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIAX has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FDIAX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIAX dropped -12.45% vs FSIAX's -17.81%.

FSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIAX and FSIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer