FDIAX vs. FNSOX
FDIAX (Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A) and FNSOX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FDIAX returned 1.72%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for FNSOX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDIAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FNSOX.
Performance
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIAX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than FNSOX's 0.07% return.
FDIAX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
FNSOX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | 0.24% | 6.38% | 4.09% | 5.76% | -6.45% | -1.62% | 4.86% | 5.72% | 0.40% | -0.12% |
FNSOX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 0.07% | 6.01% | 3.90% | 4.90% | -5.76% | -1.25% | 4.28% | 4.95% | 1.14% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIAX and FNSOX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FDIAX and FNSOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIAX vs. FNSOX — Risk / Return Rank
FDIAX
FNSOX
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDIAX | FNSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 2.22 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 6.88 | +1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIAX drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, which is greater than FNSOX's maximum drawdown of -8.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIAX and FNSOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIAX | FNSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -8.92% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -1.47% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.63% | -1.51% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.99% | -8.77% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -0.90% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -1.73% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.45% | 0.47% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund (FNSOX) at 0.71%. This indicates that FDIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNSOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIAX | FNSOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.71% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 1.56% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 2.08% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 2.90% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.40% | 2.47% | -0.07% |
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSOX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIAX vs. FNSOX - Dividend Comparison
FDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than FNSOX's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | 3.79% | 3.63% | 2.57% | 1.90% | 1.03% | 1.09% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.31% |
FNSOX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Index Fund | 3.54% | 3.22% | 2.80% | 1.74% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.54% | 2.61% | 2.04% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIAX and FNSOX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIAX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to FNSOX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIAX dropped -12.45% vs FNSOX's -8.92%.
FDIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIAX and FNSOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer