PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIAX vs. FFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a 3.36% return, which is significantly lower than FFFFX's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIAX has underperformed FFFFX with an annualized return of 4.02%, while FFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.


FSIAX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.33%
YTD
3.36%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
4.02%

FFFFX

1D
1.32%
1M
2.97%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.11%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
12.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
3.36%8.59%5.03%8.83%-12.06%3.22%7.30%10.76%-2.93%7.54%
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
13.06%22.01%13.20%20.06%-18.31%16.57%18.24%25.38%-8.94%22.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIAX and FFFFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2000

0.35

Over the past year, FSIAX and FFFFX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIAX vs. FFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIAX
FSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFFX
FFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIAXFFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.29

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

14.24

+0.58

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIAX and FFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum FFFFX drawdown of -54.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIAXFFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-54.10%

+36.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-8.71%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.13%

-14.08%

+9.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-27.21%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.19%

-30.93%

+14.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-11.12%

+9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

2.01%

-1.39%

Volatility

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) is 1.42%, while Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund (FFFFX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that FSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIAXFFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

5.13%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

10.39%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68%

12.22%

-8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

14.50%

-9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

15.12%

-10.66%

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FFFFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSIAX vs. FFFFX - Dividend Comparison

FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FFFFX's 6.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFFX
Fidelity Freedom 2040 Fund
6.30%5.07%2.63%1.72%12.33%12.09%5.67%6.69%7.97%4.37%4.05%4.81%
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
4.00%4.06%3.21%3.71%2.71%4.01%4.32%4.07%3.51%3.70%3.49%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIAX and FFFFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFFFX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FSIAX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIAX dropped -17.81% vs FFFFX's -54.10%.

FSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIAX and FFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer