FDIAX vs. VTBNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX).
FDIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. VTBNX is managed by Vanguard.
Performance
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | -0.46% | 6.38% | 4.09% | 5.76% | -6.45% | -1.62% | 4.86% | 5.72% | 0.40% | 1.58% |
VTBNX Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund | -0.60% | 7.18% | 1.32% | 5.68% | -13.12% | -1.82% | 7.39% | 8.71% | -0.27% | 3.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIAX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIAX has outperformed VTBNX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while VTBNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.56% annualized return.
FDIAX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
VTBNX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDIAX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank
FDIAX
VTBNX
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIAX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 0.98 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 1.41 | +1.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.17 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 1.77 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 5.02 | +6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIAX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 0.98 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.04 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.32 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.36 | +0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIAX and VTBNX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison
FDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than VTBNX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIAX Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A | 3.42% | 3.63% | 2.57% | 1.90% | 1.03% | 1.09% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.31% |
VTBNX Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund | 3.68% | 3.95% | 3.77% | 3.13% | 2.54% | 1.82% | 3.12% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.52% | 2.55% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIAX drawdown since its inception was -12.45%, smaller than the maximum VTBNX drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIAX and VTBNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIAX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -18.71% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | -2.67% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.99% | -18.05% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.20% | -18.71% | +8.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -3.11% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -4.91% | +3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.94% | -0.54% |
Volatility
FDIAX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Bond Fund Class A (FDIAX) is 0.80%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) has a volatility of 1.52%. This indicates that FDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDIAX | VTBNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 1.52% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 2.54% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 4.32% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 5.92% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 4.91% | -2.53% |