PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIAX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 9.94% return.


FSIAX

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.33%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.61%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
6.26%

FZROX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.73%
6M
8.29%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
1.61%8.59%5.03%8.83%-12.06%3.22%7.30%10.76%-1.87%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
9.94%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIAX and FZROX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.52

Over the past year, FSIAX and FZROX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIAX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSIAX
FSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIAXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.12

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.93

9.14

-1.21

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIAX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.81%, smaller than the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIAXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.81%

-34.96%

+17.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-8.89%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.72%

-19.38%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-25.12%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.85%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-5.43%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.06%

-1.36%

Volatility

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) is 1.00%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that FSIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIAXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

3.43%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

10.34%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

13.19%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

17.54%

-12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

20.04%

-15.59%

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSIAX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
3.78%4.06%3.21%3.71%2.71%4.01%4.32%4.07%3.51%3.70%3.49%3.18%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIAX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to FSIAX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIAX dropped -17.81% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FSIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIAX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer