PortfoliosLab logo
FSIAX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FSIAX and FSKAX is -0.77. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FSIAX:

3.87%

FSKAX:

10.48%

Max Drawdown

FSIAX:

-17.80%

FSKAX:

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

FSIAX:

-1.07%

FSKAX:

-0.06%

Returns By Period


FSIAX

YTD

0.80%

1M

1.87%

6M

0.22%

1Y

5.42%

5Y*

3.17%

10Y*

2.74%

FSKAX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FSIAX vs. FSKAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSIAX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSIAX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSIAX is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSIAX is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSIAX is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSIAX is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKAX is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M (FSIAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than FSKAX's 1.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FSIAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class M
3.52%3.92%4.05%3.37%2.44%3.06%3.18%3.40%2.88%3.23%3.46%5.09%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIAX drawdown since its inception was -17.80%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIAX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FSIAX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...