FDHY vs. ONEQ
FDHY (Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. FDHY is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDHY returned 3.99%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for ONEQ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDHY charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.
FDHY
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 2.16% | 9.24% | 7.53% | 11.14% | -11.30% | 4.33% | 10.71% | 16.87% | -2.14% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 16.16% | 20.89% | 29.30% | 45.73% | -32.12% | 22.11% | 44.87% | 38.01% | -14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDHY and ONEQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between FDHY and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDHY
ONEQ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FDHY
ONEQ
Basic Materials
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Communication Services
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Financial Services
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Healthcare
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Industrials
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Real Estate
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Technology
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Utilities
FDHY
-
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDHY vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FDHY
ONEQ
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDHY | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.40 | 2.48 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | 3.26 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 3.15 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.11 | 12.46 | +4.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDHY | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.48 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.70 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.65 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDHY | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -55.09% | +35.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -12.64% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.26% | -24.09% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.38% | -35.23% | +18.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.85% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.88% | -7.95% | +5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 3.19% | -2.69% |
Volatility
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) is 1.23%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that FDHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDHY | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 4.20% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 11.96% | -9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 16.05% | -12.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 22.14% | -15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 21.71% | -13.66% |
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDHY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDHY vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDHY Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF | 6.52% | 6.56% | 6.58% | 6.26% | 5.34% | 6.09% | 5.78% | 4.94% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDHY and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FDHY (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.
On 5-year performance, ONEQ leads with 15.43% vs 3.99% for FDHY. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.
FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.
FDHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDHY and 0.21% for ONEQ.
ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDHY and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer