PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDHY vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDHY vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's -0.33% return.


FDHY

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.17%
6M
1.67%
YTD
2.61%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.68%

FBND

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.33%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.27%
ALL TIME*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.84M$127.41M$124.15M
$3.94M$4.42M$4.10M

FDHY vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDHY
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
2.61%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.35%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
-0.33%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDHY and FBND is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.42

The correlation between FDHY and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDHY vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDHY vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDHYFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.13

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.09

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.30

2.77

+10.53

FDHY vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDHY and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDHY vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDHYFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-17.25%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-2.66%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.26%

-4.95%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-17.25%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-2.24%

+1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-3.32%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

1.05%

-0.54%

Volatility

FDHY vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF (FDHY) is 0.81%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that FDHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDHYFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.95%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

2.94%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

3.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

5.93%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.98%

6.10%

+1.88%

FDHY vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDHY vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than FBND's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.77%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FDHY
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF
6.54%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDHY and FBND have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBND has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FDHY (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 3.74% vs 0.31% for FBND. On fees, FDHY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 3.74% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDHY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.54%, compared with 4.77% for FBND.

FDHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDHY and 0.36% for FBND.

FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDHY and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer