PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDHY vs. FBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDHY vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDHY achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.72% return.


FDHY

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.90%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*

FBND

1D
0.11%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.80%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
0.79%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDHY vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
2.43%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.35%
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
0.72%7.57%2.13%6.81%-12.54%-0.43%9.41%9.82%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDHY and FBND is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.42

The correlation between FDHY and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDHY vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FBND
FBND Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDHY vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDHYFBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

1.77

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

5.07

+10.31

FDHY vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDHY and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDHY vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDHY drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDHY and FBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDHYFBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-17.25%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-2.66%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.26%

-5.94%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-17.25%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.21%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-3.34%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.93%

-0.43%

Volatility

FDHY vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) is 0.82%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that FDHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDHYFBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.13%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

2.84%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

3.83%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

5.93%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.02%

6.10%

+1.92%

FDHY vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDHY has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDHY vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

FDHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBND
Fidelity Total Bond ETF
4.69%4.70%4.73%4.26%3.07%1.86%4.25%2.90%2.93%2.56%2.84%3.26%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.51%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDHY and FBND have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to FDHY (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDHY dropped -20.01% vs FBND's -17.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDHY leads with 3.89% vs 0.79% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FDHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDHY has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDHY.

FDHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.51%, compared with 4.69% for FBND.

FDHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDHY and 0.36% for FBND.

FDHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDHY and FBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer