FDGKX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FDGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K | -3.13% | 19.47% | 24.72% | 18.00% | -11.54% | 28.10% | 2.31% | 28.84% | -7.09% | 18.03% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGKX achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 11.61%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.
FDGKX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 22.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDGKX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FDGKX
SCHG
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDGKX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.75 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.23 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.03 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 3.54 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDGKX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.75 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.57 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.79 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.79 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDGKX and SCHG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGKX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K | 7.04% | 6.82% | 7.46% | 3.57% | 11.59% | 7.90% | 1.98% | 4.95% | 23.08% | 15.37% | 1.70% | 8.50% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -53.34%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDGKX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.34% | -34.59% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -16.41% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.35% | -34.59% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.28% | -34.59% | -6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.15% | -13.34% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -5.22% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 4.78% | -1.96% |
Volatility
FDGKX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) is 5.29%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that FDGKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDGKX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 6.67% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 12.51% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.16% | 22.43% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 22.32% | -5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.51% | -2.31% |