PortfoliosLab logo
FDGKX vs. FDGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDGKX and FDGFX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
166.94%
380.27%
FDGKX
FDGFX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDGKX:

0.01

FDGFX:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

FDGKX:

0.17

FDGFX:

0.73

Omega Ratio

FDGKX:

1.02

FDGFX:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FDGKX:

0.01

FDGFX:

0.44

Martin Ratio

FDGKX:

0.05

FDGFX:

1.64

Ulcer Index

FDGKX:

6.19%

FDGFX:

5.75%

Daily Std Dev

FDGKX:

22.64%

FDGFX:

21.87%

Max Drawdown

FDGKX:

-55.23%

FDGFX:

-60.08%

Current Drawdown

FDGKX:

-12.62%

FDGFX:

-12.57%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDGKX having a -6.37% return and FDGFX slightly higher at -6.30%. Over the past 10 years, FDGKX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 2.92%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.40% annualized return.


FDGKX

YTD

-6.37%

1M

-5.10%

6M

-7.65%

1Y

-1.17%

5Y*

10.91%

10Y*

2.92%

FDGFX

YTD

-6.30%

1M

-5.03%

6M

-5.61%

1Y

7.81%

5Y*

17.02%

10Y*

9.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FDGFX: current value is 0.48%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FDGFX: 0.48%
Expense ratio chart for FDGKX: current value is 0.38%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FDGKX: 0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDGKX vs. FDGFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGKX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDGKX is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDGKX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDGKX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDGKX is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDGKX is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDGKX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDGFX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDGFX is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDGKX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FDGKX: 0.01
FDGFX: 0.43
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDGKX, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FDGKX: 0.17
FDGFX: 0.73
The chart of Omega ratio for FDGKX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FDGKX: 1.02
FDGFX: 1.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDGKX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FDGKX: 0.01
FDGFX: 0.44
The chart of Martin ratio for FDGKX, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FDGKX: 0.05
FDGFX: 1.64

The current FDGKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGKX and FDGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.01
0.43
FDGKX
FDGFX

Dividends

FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

FDGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than FDGFX's 10.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDGKX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K
0.96%1.09%1.52%1.75%1.08%1.98%1.69%2.50%1.95%1.70%9.85%19.80%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
10.39%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%17.18%1.58%9.63%19.50%

Drawdowns

FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGKX drawdown since its inception was -55.23%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGKX and FDGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-12.62%
-12.57%
FDGKX
FDGFX

Volatility

FDGKX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund Class K (FDGKX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) have volatilities of 14.53% and 14.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.53%
14.47%
FDGKX
FDGFX