FDG vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

FDG vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 3.50% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

FDG

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 1.28%
• YTD: 3.50%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 24.61%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDG vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	3.50%	0.18%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and POW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

FDG vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 34
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDG vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDG	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	—	—

Drawdowns

FDG vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDG	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.69%	-18.37%	-25.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.75%	-18.37%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.30%	-4.33%	-8.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDG	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	32.94%	-13.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.94%	32.94%	-8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.95%	32.94%	-7.99%

FDG vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDG vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDG and POW in my portfolio?

FDG and POW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDG or POW?

On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDG or POW?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDG or POW?

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between FDG and POW?

FDG is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: American Century and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.75% for POW.