FDG vs. SCHB
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. FDG is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 10.32%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
FDG vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 10.41% return.
FDG
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
FDG vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 3.76% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 96.27% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 10.41% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 60.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and SCHB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FDG and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDG vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDG
SCHB
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FDG
SCHB
Communication Services
FDG
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
FDG
SCHB
Healthcare
FDG
SCHB
Industrials
FDG
SCHB
Financial Services
FDG
SCHB
Energy
FDG
SCHB
Utilities
FDG
SCHB
Basic Materials
FDG
-
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
FDG
-
SCHB
Real Estate
FDG
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
SCHB
FDG vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 3.05 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | 13.57 | -7.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDG vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -35.27% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -8.91% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -19.34% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -25.41% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -1.50% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -4.11% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.00% | +2.61% |
Volatility
FDG vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.80%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 4.80% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 10.00% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 12.77% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 17.34% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 18.37% | +6.61% |
FDG vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and SCHB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDG has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to SCHB (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.43% vs 10.32% for FDG. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
FDG is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDG and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer