FDG vs. CCOR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 8.96%/yr vs -1.67%/yr for CCOR. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

FDG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's 0.43% return.

FDG

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -3.88%
• 6M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 1Y: 14.28%
• 3Y*: 22.99%
• 5Y*: 8.96%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.05%

CCOR

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.53%
• 6M: -3.08%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 1Y: -1.08%
• 3Y*: -0.82%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	$61.54K	$68.15K	$77.63K
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	$1.83M	$1.61M	$2.38M

FDG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.10%	22.13%	45.89%	37.22%	-35.74%	8.52%	96.27%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.43%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FDG and CCOR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.24
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020	0.01

The correlation between FDG and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (3 years) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDG vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDG	CCOR
Technology	39.9%	15.7%
Communication Services	24.5%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.8%	9.1%
Healthcare	9.2%	12.2%
Industrials	5.5%	9.4%
Financial Services	3.5%	18.6%
Energy	0.6%	6.4%
Utilities	0.1%	6.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	6.9%
Basic Materials	-	4.9%
Real Estate	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

FDG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 24
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	-0.12	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	-0.11	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.99	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	-0.11	+0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	-0.23	+2.29

FDG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDG and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.69%	-22.99%	-20.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.71%	-8.79%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.14%	-12.31%	-13.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.69%	-22.99%	-20.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.82%	-16.59%	+6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-7.47%	-5.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.45%	4.18%	+1.27%

Volatility

FDG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.61%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.67%	3.61%	+4.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.13%	6.45%	+10.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.59%	8.20%	+12.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.09%	11.19%	+13.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	10.78%	+14.21%

FDG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	0.99%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDG and CCOR in my portfolio?

FDG and CCOR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDG or CCOR?

FDG has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to CCOR (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, FDG or CCOR?

On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 8.96% vs -1.67% for CCOR. On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDG or CCOR?

Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 8.96% return vs -1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDG or CCOR?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDG or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between FDG and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Core Alternative. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.