FDG vs. BDVL
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FDG is actively managed, while BDVL is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
FDG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 4.71% return.
FDG
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 4.71%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.52% | 5.27% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 4.71% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and BDVL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.60 |
FDG vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDG
BDVL
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FDG
BDVL
Communication Services
FDG
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
FDG
BDVL
Healthcare
FDG
BDVL
Industrials
FDG
BDVL
Financial Services
FDG
BDVL
Energy
FDG
BDVL
Utilities
FDG
BDVL
Basic Materials
FDG
-
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
FDG
-
BDVL
Real Estate
FDG
-
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
BDVL
FDG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -7.71% | -35.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -0.95% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -1.19% | -12.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility
FDG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 9.49% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 9.49% | +15.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 9.49% | +15.41% |
FDG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.66% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for FDG and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer