FDEM vs. FIVA
FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) and FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FIVA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDEM returned 9.43%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for FIVA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDEM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FIVA.
Performance
FDEM vs. FIVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDEM achieves a 22.58% return, which is significantly higher than FIVA's 12.92% return.
FDEM
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 24.26%
- 1Y
- 45.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FDEM vs. FIVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 22.58% | 26.75% | 9.34% | 17.26% | -13.11% | -3.52% | 8.87% | 5.73% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDEM and FIVA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between FDEM and FIVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDEM vs. FIVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDEM
FIVA
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FDEM
FIVA
Financial Services
FDEM
FIVA
Consumer Cyclical
FDEM
FIVA
Communication Services
FDEM
FIVA
Energy
FDEM
FIVA
Consumer Defensive
FDEM
FIVA
Real Estate
FDEM
FIVA
Industrials
FDEM
FIVA
Basic Materials
FDEM
FIVA
Healthcare
FDEM
-
FIVA
Utilities
FDEM
-
FIVA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDEM vs. FIVA — Risk / Return Rank
FDEM
FIVA
FDEM vs. FIVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) and Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDEM | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.42 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.09 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.12 | 12.07 | +2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDEM | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.39 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.77 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
FDEM vs. FIVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDEM drawdown since its inception was -33.65%, smaller than the maximum FIVA drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEM and FIVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDEM | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.65% | -39.76% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.70% | -11.71% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.04% | -14.77% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.02% | -28.70% | -0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.36% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -7.78% | -1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.99% | +0.24% |
Volatility
FDEM vs. FIVA - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) at 5.02%. This indicates that FDEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDEM | FIVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 5.02% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 12.40% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 15.18% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 16.33% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 17.90% | +0.01% |
FDEM vs. FIVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDEM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FIVA's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDEM vs. FIVA - Dividend Comparison
FDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than FIVA's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF | 2.66% | 3.23% | 4.05% | 4.41% | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.84% | 2.39% | 0.00% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDEM and FIVA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDEM has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FIVA (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEM dropped -33.65% vs FIVA's -39.76%.
On 5-year performance, FIVA leads with 12.50% vs 9.43% for FDEM. On fees, FIVA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FIVA has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIVA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDEM.
FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.
FDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FIVA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index, while FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDEM and 0.39% for FIVA.
FDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDEM and FIVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer